Jumpman Wins £13.2m HMRC Free Spins Tax Appeal

From exclusive events and interviews to real-time market trends, Ace Alliance brings you unbiased, well-informed, and data-driven content. Our editorial team adheres to strict editorial standards, ensuring that the information you receive is not only relevant but also trustworthy.

Built by market experts hosting events since 2023, with our first event in Riga, Latvia gathering over 300 top level iGaming industry executives, Ace Alliance is able to provide you with reliable information from direct interaction with experts and leaders in the sector.

Altay Celikkaya

Content Manager

Updated: 29/09/26

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Jumpman Gaming has won a significant UK tax appeal over the treatment of promotional free spins, with the Upper Tribunal ordering approximately £13.2m in Remote Gaming Duty assessments to be reduced to nil.

The decision, issued on 25 September 2026, reverses a key part of an earlier First-tier Tribunal ruling and provides new clarity on how certain freeplay promotions should be treated under UK gambling tax law. The case is particularly relevant for online casino operators as Remote Gaming Duty has risen sharply and promotional economics face greater pressure.

Jumpman Gaming wins its HMRC tax appeal, with the graphic featuring HM Revenue & Customs branding and the Jumpman Gaming logo against a UK backdrop.

Regulation & Compliance

Key Takeaways From the Jumpman HMRC Free Spins Ruling

Jumpman successfully challenged approximately £13.2m in Remote Gaming Duty assessments covering July 2018 to December 2022.
The Upper Tribunal found that further free spins awarded through Jumpman’s promotional Mega Reel could fall within the statutory freeplay exclusion.
The decision follows the UK’s Remote Gaming Duty increase from 21% to 40% in April 2026, increasing the commercial importance of promotional tax treatment.

Upper Tribunal Overturns Key Part of Earlier Ruling

The dispute centred on Jumpman’s welcome promotion. Customers making a qualifying deposit received a free spin on the operator’s Mega Reel, which could then award additional free spins on other casino games.

HMRC argued that those subsequent spins should be treated as gaming payments for Remote Gaming Duty purposes. The First-tier Tribunal largely accepted that position in 2025.

However, the Upper Tribunal’s official judgment reached a different conclusion when considering section 159A of the Finance Act 2014. It found that the relevant wording referred to remote gaming more broadly and was not limited to gaming undertaken through an earlier waived-payment offer.

The Upper Tribunal said:

Jumpman’s interpretation reflects the more immediate reading of the words used.

As a result, the further free spins qualified for the statutory exclusion and did not create the additional RGD liability claimed by HMRC. The tribunal concluded that the disputed assessments should be reduced to nil.

Why the Free Spins Decision Matters for Operators

The judgment comes during a tougher tax environment for UK-facing online casino businesses. HMRC’s official Remote Gaming Duty guidance confirms that the rate increased from 21% to 40% on 1 April 2026 and applies to gaming providers’ profits from remote gaming with UK customers.

The UK’s Remote Gaming Duty increase to 40% has already raised concerns around higher operating costs and potential black-market pressure. The Jumpman ruling adds another consideration because the tax treatment of bonuses can directly affect promotional costs, acquisition strategies and player retention.

Recent analysis of UK iGaming demand after the tax rise also pointed to relatively resilient demand in the first months of the 40% regime while highlighting shifts in projected revenue and operator economics.

HMRC’s guidance also requires RGD-liable providers to retain details of free or reduced-cost play offers, including their take-up, use and the value that would have applied if customers paid the full amount. Accurate promotion records therefore remain important even where a specific freeplay structure falls outside an additional duty charge.

Promotional Strategy Remains Under Wider Scrutiny

The ruling does not mean every free spin or casino bonus is automatically exempt from Remote Gaming Duty. The outcome depended on Jumpman’s promotion and the Upper Tribunal’s interpretation of the statutory provisions involved.

Operators are also facing wider scrutiny around how promotions are communicated. Recent UKGC research on gambling promotions and informed choice found that gambling risks and relevant consumer information should be sufficiently prominent alongside promotional messages and rewards.

For B2B teams, the Jumpman judgment therefore sits at the intersection of tax, compliance and commercial strategy. Casino operators may review how freeplay chains are structured and documented while considering whether promotional mechanics remain sustainable under the UK’s 40% RGD regime.

The ruling is a notable victory for Jumpman, but its broader value will depend on how operators apply the decision to their own promotional models and whether HMRC takes further action.