Home News Brazilian Court Overturns Stake's Temporary Betting Ban Exemption
Brazilian Court Overturns Stake’s Temporary Betting Ban Exemption
TRF3 Backs Government Appeal Against Stake
According to Agência Brasil’s 9 October report, TRF3 President Judge Johonsom Di Salvo accepted the AGU’s appeal against Stake’s temporary operating permission. The court concluded that allowing one betting platform to continue operating while competitors faced restrictions could undermine the government’s nationwide policy.
Judge Johonsom Di Salvo said:
Allowing only one company to remain authorised while others face restrictions creates regulatory asymmetry.
The reversal follows an earlier court decision that granted Stake temporary protection, preserving its operating authorisation until 25 October.
That protection has now been suspended, meaning Stake can no longer rely on the earlier injunction to keep accepting bets. The ruling does not constitute a final judgment on the legality of Brazil’s gambling ban.
Wider Legal Challenges Remain Unresolved
The decision comes as Brazil implements Provisional Measure 1,394/2026, which prohibits fixed-odds sports betting and online casino operations nationwide. The measure underpins Brazil’s betting ban and the industry’s response, requiring operators to cease betting activities and fulfil outstanding regulatory obligations.
Meanwhile, the National Association of Games and Lotteries (ANJL) and the Brazilian Institute of Responsible Gaming (IBJR) are challenging the measure’s constitutionality before the Supreme Federal Court (STF). Their petitions remain under Justice Luiz Fux.
What the Reversal Means for Operators
For licensed operators, the ruling highlights how difficult it is to secure individual exemptions from a nationwide restriction. The decision also reinforces the operational uncertainty facing betting businesses during the player refund and shutdown process.
While Stake’s temporary protection has ended, the wider constitutional dispute remains unresolved. Further judicial decisions could determine whether operators can challenge the restrictions individually or whether Brazil’s nationwide prohibition will remain enforceable throughout the ongoing proceedings.